|
te provoaca sa gandesti
Intrebari, raspunsuri, corectari...
subiecte similare: Cine stie engleza, raspunde... InGeRi PierdutZi InGeRi PierdutZi FETISISMUL, BATA-L VINA! comentarii (57):
Incep eu
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 08:49:59
Eu stiu ca "intradevar" se scrie asa, legat. Il gasesc foarte des scris "intr-adevar". Cum e corect?
#536506
comenteaza . modifica .
semnaleaza adminului
.
blocheaza userul
***
- de
amari
la: 19/04/2010 09:36:27
stiu ca se scrie cu cratima,nu sunt insa sigura cu toate modificarile din ultima vreme.
eu
- de
Calypso
la: 19/04/2010 10:42:54
asa: "intr-adevar" l-am invatat la scoala;
si tot la scoala am invatat ca se scrie "nici o" si nu "nicio" cum l-am vazut in ultima vreme.
"nicio, niciun"
- de
Intruder
la: 19/04/2010 11:24:21
Modificat la: 19/04/2010 11:24:57
pe vremea ducai-voda si-a tovarasei invatatoare am invatat "nici o", "nici un" dar acum, doom-ul ne spune ca se scrie legat - precum "vreo", "vreun".
"intr-adevar" se scrie cu cratima.
intruder,
- de
Calypso
la: 19/04/2010 11:34:40
da' cine-i doom-ul asta? stii cumva explicatia pe care-au dat-o cind au facut schimbarea din "nici o" in "nicio"?
Calypso
- de
Intruder
la: 19/04/2010 11:49:27
explicatia academiei romane e aia scrisa de mine, mai sus.
se scrie "nicio", "niciun" asa cum se scrie "vreo", "vreun".
dar cum se scrie corect
- de
amari
la: 19/04/2010 12:47:29
"Isus" sau "Iisus" pentru ca am inteles ca in ebraica "isus" inseamna magar.Si-n continuare "Hristos" sau "Christos" ori "Cristos"?
amari
- de
RSI
la: 19/04/2010 12:53:43
Modificat la: 19/04/2010 12:57:10
te asigur ca in ebraica "isus" nu este magar. Nu stiu cum este in limba greaca, dar am vazut ca multi scriu Isus.
Am gasit si un articol scris de cineva mai in tema decat mine: http://www.moldovacrestina.net/doctrina/care-este-numele-corect-al-mntuitorului-iisus-sau-isus/
amari
- de
RSI
la: 19/04/2010 13:15:45
alt link care da o explicatie ce mi se pare pertinenta:
http://www.isushristos.org/isus-sau-iisus-.html
Nu-i gramatica si nici de limba romana dar nu stiu...
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 17:57:23
Folosim cu totii micul cuvant OK in sens de bine, in regula. De unde vine acest ok? Sunt doua initiale? Ce cuvinte prescurteaza?
prietenul google raspunde:
- de
zaraza
la: 19/04/2010 19:06:48
Modificat la: 19/04/2010 19:12:42
Dear Cecil:
This question seems like such an obvious candidate for your column that someone must have asked it before. But on the chance no one has, here goes: what does "OK" stand for, and where does the expression come from? I've heard a lot of different explanations over the years. — Norm, Chicago Dear Norm: Yeah, and it's about time I got things cleared up. Despite the fact that the origin of OK was conclusively established 30 years ago, few etymological dictionaries, even recent ones, give it accurately. On the contrary, some persist in giving equal time to explanations that have been discredited for decades. Eric Partridge, in Origins (1983), says OK derives from the OK Club, which supported Martin "Old Kinderhook" Van Buren in 1840. That isn't wrong, but it's only half the story. William and Mary Morris, in the Morris Dictionary of Word and Phrase Origins (1977), mention the OK Club and give several other theories as well, including the off-the-wall idea that OK comes from "Aux Cayes," a port in Haiti noted for its rum. They imply the matter is still shrouded in mystery. Baloney. The etymology of OK was masterfully explained by the distinguished Columbia University professor Allen Walker Read in a series of articles in the journal American Speech in 1963 and 1964. The letters, not to keep you guessing, stand for "oll korrect." They're the result of a fad for comical abbreviations that flourished in the late 1830s and 1840s. Read buttressed his arguments with hundreds of citations from newspapers and other documents of the period. As far as I know his work has never been successfully challenged. The abbreviation fad began in Boston in the summer of 1838 and spread to New York and New Orleans in 1839. The Boston newspapers began referring satirically to the local swells as OFM, "our first men," and used expressions like NG, "no go," GT, "gone to Texas," and SP, "small potatoes." Many of the abbreviated expressions were exaggerated misspellings, a stock in trade of the humorists of the day. One predecessor of OK was OW, "oll wright," and there was also KY, "know yuse," KG, "know go," and NS, "nuff said." Most of these acronyms enjoyed only a brief popularity. But OK was an exception, no doubt because it came in so handy. It first found its way into print in Boston in March of 1839 and soon became widespread among the hipper element.
continuare
- de
zaraza
la: 19/04/2010 19:07:10
It didn't really enter the language at large, however, until 1840. That's when Democratic supporters of Martin Van Buren adopted it as the name of their political club, giving OK a double meaning. ("Old Kinderhook" was a native of Kinderhook, New York.)
OK became the warcry of Tammany hooligans in New York while beating up their opponents. It was mentioned in newspaper stories around the country. Van Buren's opponents tried to turn the phrase against him, saying that it had originated with Van Buren's allegedly illiterate predecessor, Andrew Jackson, a story that has survived to this day. They also devoted considerable energy to coming up with unflattering interpretations, e.g., "Out of Kash, Out of Kredit, and Out of Klothes." Newspaper editors and publicists around the country delighted in coming up with even sillier interpretations-- Oll Killed, Orfully Konfused, Often Kontradicts, etc.--so that by the time the campaign was over the expression had taken firm root nationwide. As time went on, though, people forgot about the abbreviation fad and Old Kinderhook and began manufacturing their own etymologies. Here's a sampling: (1) It's a derivative of the Choctaw Indian affirmative "okeh." Andrew Jackson, who figures in many stories about OK, is said to have introduced the word to the white man. (2) Another Jackson story has it that he used to mark OK for "oll korrect" on court documents. In the one example of this that was actually unearthed, however, the OK was found actually to be OR, for "order recorded," a common courthouse abbreviation. (3) It was a telegraphic signal meaning "open key," that is, ready to receive. Others say OK was used for "all right" because A and R had already been appropriated for other purposes. Big problem with this theory: the first telegraph message was transmitted in 1844, five years after OK appeared. (4) It stands for O. Kendall & Sons, a supplier of army biscuits that stamped its initials on its product. (5) It comes from Aux Cayes, already discussed. A variant is that it comes from the French au quai, "to the dock," said of cotton that had been approved for loading on a ship. (6) It stands for Obediah Kelly, a railroad freight agent, who used to mark his initials on documents to indicate all was in order. (7) It comes from the Greek Olla Kalla, "all good." (8) A German general who fought on the side of the Americans in the Revolutionary War used to sign documents OK for Ober-Kommando. There are dozens of other interpretations, all equally knuckleheaded. Pay them no mind. If Professor Read says OK = oll korrect, that's good enough for me. — Cecil Adams
:)
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 19:11:58
Ceva ceva tot am inteles...Multam!
:)
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 19:14:04
Se vede ca fiind luni...Ma gandeam la "intruna", il gasesc si legat si dezlegat...
Baby
- de
Apoll
la: 19/04/2010 19:46:49
intruna se scrie numai cand ii adverb si are mai ales sensul 'mereu'.
Ex: vorbeste intruna.
Apoll
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 19:55:35
Ai dreptate. Intruna! :D
Cum
- de
Apoll
la: 19/04/2010 20:05:25
ii corect :celalt sau cellalt?
Masa
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 20:20:56
Pluralul? Mese, mase? Sau amandoua?
Si mai am niste plurale (pluraluri? :D)
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 20:31:32
Plapuma-plapume sau plapumi?
Pana-pene sau pane? Stiu ca ma fac de cacao...Cacao are plural? Nu cred...
ambele
- de
Apoll
la: 19/04/2010 20:32:59
(ese)de la mobila si (ase) de la atom,hai, ca asta o stiai!:)
popa
- de
Apoll
la: 19/04/2010 20:39:06
a mancat vreo sapte mese
pe la praznice,prin sat si-a starnit hazul in mase cu burtoiul lui umflat.:)
:)
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 20:44:40
Daca ai sti cate stiam si acuma nu mai stiu...
DEX-ul
- de
Intruder
la: 19/04/2010 21:00:41
da mura-n gura, inclusiv pluralul substantivelor dar e greu sa dai click sau sa rasfoiesti mastodontul, neh?
masa-mese cand e vorba de chestia aia pe care mancam, sau de hrana (masa de pranz, mese de seara). masa-mase cand e vorba de grup (grupuri de indivizi sau o cantitate neprecizata) si tot asa...vezi dexonline.ro daca n-ai un mastodont.
:D
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 21:03:36
Pai de ce existati voi?
In loc de dexonline.ro fac cafeneaua.com. Ma simt in largul meu aici...dar ai dreptate.
???
- de
Intruder
la: 19/04/2010 21:11:07
care "voi"?
inteleg sa-ntrebi pe cafenea, da' de ce sa-ntrebi chestii d-astea facile???? imi dai impresia de frivolitate si pe bune ca nu-ti sta bine. ...sau e o confa ciuri-buri si nu stiu io?
Cu tine nu-mi merge...:)))
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 21:19:00
Eu cand citesc texte si comentarii urmaresc mereu si gramatica. Nu ca sa-i verific pe cafegii, ci sa ma verific pe mine...Unii aveti o gramatica impecabila (tu, monte, modi, zaraza, cuminte, amari etc, etc), dar altii mai gresesc pe ici pe colo...Eu nu-mi permit sa corectez, ca sa nu ranesc sensibilitati...Confa asta se vrea, in esenta, un indemn, o confruntare, o corectare...un spatiu, fie si de rusine, pentru unii dintre noi care gresim limbii romane...
***
- de
Intruder
la: 19/04/2010 21:25:15
nu, nu am o gramatica impecabila si nici nu vreau sa evadez din spatiul meu flu-flu. :P
:)
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 21:28:42
Ce legatura are gramatica cu spatiul flu-flu? OK, nu ai o gramatica impecabila...
aceeasi legatura
- de
Intruder
la: 19/04/2010 21:32:39
cu ranirea sensibilitatilor...?
ideea era ca nu-mi plac impecabilii, au idei fixe. :D
:D
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 21:43:28
Sunt convinsa ca tu ai idei mai fixe decat impecabilii!
***
- de
Intruder
la: 19/04/2010 21:48:38
nu, nu-s fixe, au un termen de valabilitate dupa care le schimb.
pe ce te bazezi in convingerea ta? :P
***
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 21:58:29
Nu, nu-ti vei schimba ideile niciodata! Globul meu de cristal asa-mi arata...
Iti poti schimba cursul vietii, sentimentele, dar ideile niciodata...
baby
- de
lafemme
la: 19/04/2010 22:01:07
am un chef nebun sa dau cu globul tau de cristal de toti peretii. pot?
;;)
femme
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 19/04/2010 22:02:54
Nuuuu...E singura mea avere...
te lansezi prea usor
- de
Intruder
la: 19/04/2010 22:23:58
in afirmatii fara acoperire...si nu mai intru in amanunte.
globul de cristal poti sa-l pui propta la usa cafenelei...
:(
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 20/04/2010 07:11:45
Iar ma simt ranita in sensibilitate...E marti, cateva ceasuri rele trebuie sa am...Bine, imi voi acoperi mai bine afirmatiile...Globul de cristal nu mai exista. L-am aruncat noaptea asta.
te simti ranita in sensibilitate???
- de
Intruder
la: 20/04/2010 10:35:35
ok! atunci abtine-te in a debita concluzii fara fundament cu privire la sentimentele altor persoane...persoane pe care NU le cunosti.
Ok.
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 20/04/2010 17:34:37
Ma voi abtine...Dar esti sigur ca NU le cunosc? Pe ce te bazezi?
***
- de
Intruder
la: 20/04/2010 17:43:06
pe MINE sunt sigur ca NU ma cunosti...m-am referit la commurile adresate mie personal.
***
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 20/04/2010 18:22:14
Te-ai referit la commurile adresate tie personal dar in commul precedent ai folosit pluralul. Oricum, ai dreptate si iti datorez scuze. Nu voi mai face nici o afirmatie in ceea ce te priveste...Nici macar in gluma.
***
- de
Intruder
la: 20/04/2010 18:44:25
bine, ma repliez si retrag pluralul dar nu te referi la sentimentele mele daca nu ma cunosti.
adica tu te simti ranita in sensibilitate de mitocanu' Intruder si io n-am voie sa fiu mimoza? nope!
Bine, mimozo! :D
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 20/04/2010 19:06:28
Am fost doar ironica si autoironica. Nu m-am simtit ranita in nici o sensibilitate, stai linistit...
Dar da, uit ca esti "gemeni"...Ma lansez aiurea in conversatii cu tine.
***
- de
Intruder
la: 20/04/2010 19:34:39
am stat si stau foarte linistit, nu am mancarimi niciunde...:D
da, gemenii sunt cah, nu se pot ridica la ranguri inalte...nasolache.
***
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 20/04/2010 19:41:08
Nu era vorba despre ranguri in propozitie ci despre toane si tonuri.
Ma bucur ca nu ai mancarimi niciunde...:D
care stie
- de
Calypso
la: 24/04/2010 09:51:25
cum se pune un video you tube in text?
de exemplu
- de
Calypso
la: 24/04/2010 09:52:29
asta
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFvqvZOtCF0&feature=related
Calypso
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 24/04/2010 09:55:12
Justa e specialista...:) Eu nu stiu sa pun nici fotografii.
BM,
- de
Calypso
la: 24/04/2010 10:03:30
mie-mi spui...
am tone de fotografii, dar tot degeaba...
Calypso
- de
amari
la: 24/04/2010 10:10:22
pe pagina de YouTube unde-i filmul,sub el in coltul din dreapta ai un buton unde scrie
Calypso
- de
Baby Mititelu
la: 24/04/2010 10:32:51
Stii care-i problema mea? Ca daca invat, dupa aceea nu ma mai pot opri...:D Am tone de fotografii si eu.
Sunt maniaca. Ii stresez pe toti.
test
- de
Calypso
la: 26/04/2010 09:10:02
merci
- de
Calypso
la: 26/04/2010 09:10:57
amari; vad c-a mers
intr-un autobuz sunt 7 fete
- de
Horia D
la: 26/04/2010 09:53:37
fiecare fata are 7 genti, in fiecare geanta sunt 7 pisici mari, fiecare avand 7 pisoi.
Atat pisicile, cat si pisoii au 4 picioare. Cate picioare sunt in autobuz???
Horia
- de
mazariche
la: 26/04/2010 10:56:44
Asta-i pentru confa aia a lui Boldea, cu ganditul... Chiar astepti raspuns?:)
7fete x 2picioare = 14 picioare 7pisici x 4 = 28 picioare 7pisoi x 4 x 7 = 196 Ar trebui sa fie 238 toate, fara ale soferului. C-atunci sunt 240. Dar nu garantez c-am calculat corect, fara hartie si creion. Sau una din fete-i soferul?:)
Mazariche
- de
Horia D
la: 26/04/2010 15:33:04
Mai citeste.. Fiecare fata are 7 genti, in fiecare geanta sunt 7 pisici, fiecare pisica are 7 pisoi...
Numai daca numar cozile am o cifra aproape de a ta:)))
Horia
- de
mazariche
la: 26/04/2010 16:10:55
Ah, si eu care am vrut sa ma dau rotunda!:)) Normal ca mi-au scapat gentile, doar nu era sa fiu atenta la tot:P
Dar nu mi-ai raspuns la intrebare, se pune sau nu soferul?:)
Horia D
- de
amari
la: 26/04/2010 16:13:28
Intrebarea era cate picioare erau in autobuz iar raspunsul strict este: 7x2=14 picioare(vorba lui mazariche,fara sofer).
Dar ai specificat ca atat pisicile cat si pisoii au cate 4 picioare si atunci:pentru ca 7 fete au 49 de genti si 343 de pisici dar si 2401 de pisoi rezulta ca sunt 2744 de animalute cu 10976 de labute.Iar raspunsul in varianta cu picioare nu cu labute la feline este:10980 picioare.
|
 loading... |
