comentarii

messagi d


Cursuri de matematica si fizica online!
Incearca-le gratuit acum

Peste 3500 de videouri de cursuri cu teorie, teste si exemple explicate
www.prepa.ro
Germania - de (anonim) la: 04/11/2003 12:35:45
(la: EvZ: Imigrantul anti-imigratie)
Iata ceva interesant de citit ptr. cei ce vor sa stie cit mai multe despre Germania


Subject: Iata tratamentul aplicat aptrizilor romani - unii din 1985 aici! - din Germania...


In timp ce statul german sprijina financiar si logistic pe toti musulmanii -
dusmanii declarati ai crestinismului - de aici (in realitate multi sunt
coloana a cincea a lor de distrugere a Occidentului!!) pana si etremisti
notorii, cum e Califul din Köln, Kaplan, care cere oficial desfiintarea
democratiei si a Germaniei ce-l gazduieste si nu este expulzat, iata mai jos
ce fac autoritatile nemtesti cu romani crestini si familiile lor de 10-15
ani aici, perfect adaptate din toate punctele de vedere!!
Din pacate, sunt similitudini cu cel de-al Treilea Reich German...

Eugen Cojocaru - Stuttgart/Germania

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ioan Muntean"
To: "Eugen Cojocaru"
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: rugaminte


> Stimate Domnule Cojocaru,
>
> Va multumesc.
>
> Situatia apatrizilor este tot mai dramatica. Mai nou au fost bagati
apatrizi
> la puscarie fiindca au atras atentia capitanului avionului de deportare ca
> actele de deportare contin falsuri (ex la rubrica "Staatsangehörigkeit"
erau
> trecuti "rumänisch", cu toate ca erau apatrizi din 1994). Astfel, sint in
> puscarie la Rottenburg / Neckar dl Demeter (de o luna - 2 saptamini a stat
in
> greva foamei) iar la Schwäbisch Gmünd d-na Hazota. Ambii au copii minori
(11-13
> ani) nadscuti aici.
>
> Despre Demeter in puscarie a scris in Le Monde acum 10 zile dl de
Tricornot.
>
> Va doresc numai bine,
>
> Ioan Muntean
>
>
>
#3189 (raspuns la: #3183) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
sursa si autor - de Catalin Francu la: 13/11/2003 15:10:39
(la: Romani in strainatate)
Se pare ca articolul e scris de Razvan Popa / Adevarul, conform

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/natminet/message/2532

Din pacate, arhiva online a Adevarului e accesibila numai celor ce se inregistreaza (succes, statisticile arata ca cerand utilizatorului sa se inregistreze pentru a vedea ceva pierzi cam 90% din utilizatori).
#4181 (raspuns la: #4161) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Germania_tratamentul aplicat aptrizilor romani - de SB_one la: 20/12/2003 15:26:32
(la: Romani in strainatate)
From: Eugen Cojocaru
Date: Dienstag, 4. November 2003 13:33:41
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:,
Subject: Iata tratamentul aplicat aptrizilor romani - unii din 1985 aici! - din Germania...


In timp ce statul german sprijina financiar si logistic pe toti musulmanii - dusmanii declarati ai crestinismului - de aici (in realitate multi sunt coloana a cincea a lor de distrugere a Occidentului!!) pana si etremisti notorii, cum e Califul din Köln, Kaplan, care cere oficial desfiintarea democratiei si a Germaniei ce-l gazduieste si nu este expulzat, iata mai jos ce fac autoritatile nemtesti cu romani crestini si familiile lor de 10-15 ani aici, perfect adaptate din toate punctele de vedere!!
Din pacate, sunt similitudini cu cel de-al Treilea Reich German...

Eugen Cojocaru - Stuttgart/Germania

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ioan Muntean"
To: "Eugen Cojocaru"
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: rugaminte


> Stimate Domnule Cojocaru,
>
> Va multumesc.
>
> Situatia apatrizilor este tot mai dramatica. Mai nou au fost bagati
apatrizi la puscarie fiindca au atras atentia capitanului avionului de deportare ca actele de deportare contin falsuri (ex la rubrica "Staatsangehörigkeit" erau trecuti "rumänisch", cu toate ca erau apatrizi din 1994).
Astfel, sint in puscarie la Rottenburg / Neckar dl Demeter (de o luna - 2 saptamini a stat in greva foamei) iar la Schwäbisch Gmünd d-na Hazota. Ambii au copii minori(11-13 ani) nadscuti aici.

> Despre Demeter in puscarie a scris in Le Monde acum 10 zile dl de
Tricornot.
>
> Va doresc numai bine,
>
> Ioan Muntean
#7028 (raspuns la: #7027) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
articol fotoreporter de razboi - de Dinu Lazar la: 16/01/2004 00:23:04
(la: O conversatie cu DINU LAZAR, fotograf)
Din pacate, la mine se vede asa la cautarea acestui articol:

404 Error Message:
Page Not Found on http://www.jurnalul.ro
#8120 (raspuns la: #8102) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Iata dovada ca romanii pot sa fie uniti! - de SB_one la: 03/02/2004 12:14:47
(la: Aderarea la UE: asa... mai prin 2050)
Iata dovada ca romanii pot sa fie uniti!

----- Original Message -----
From:
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 5:24 PM
Subject: ROMPRES:LOCALE

Organizatiile românilor din emigratie îsi exprimã solidaritatea cu traseul si agenda negocierilor României pentru aderarea la UE
Bucuresti, 2 feb /Rompres/

- Departamentul pentru românii de pretutindeni a salutat luni initiativa reprezentantilor unor organizatii ale românilor din
emigratie de a-si exprima solidaritatea fatã de traseul si agenda
negocierilor de aderare a României la Uniunea Europeanã, ca reactie la
propunerea unui europarlamentar de suspendare a negocierilor de aderare cu tara noastrã.

Într-o scrisoare redactatã la iniþiativa Uniunii Mondiale a Românilor Liberi(UMRL) si care a fost semnatã pânã în prezent de Comitetul Coordonator Internaþional al UMRL, Consiliul Mondial Român (CMR), Lumea Româneascã din SUA, Alianta Românilor Canadieni (ARC), Liga Asociatiilor Româno-Germane (LARG) si Asociatia Canadiano-Românã a Profesorilor Universitari - Ontario, Canada (ACRUPO), reprezentantii românilor din emigratie îsi exprimã solidaritatea cu procesul de negociere României, fãcând referire la consensul politic realizat în cadrul Consiliului European din decembrie 2003.

Într-un comunicat de presã transmis luni, Departamentul pentru românii de pretutindeni salutã semnificatia si maturitatea gestului de solidaritate româneascã, precum si faptul cã, independent de diversitatea optiunilor lor politice, organizatiile amintite au perceput iniþiativele de suspendare a negocierilor ca fiind în contradictie cu interesele nationale ale României, subscriind, prin mesajul lor comun, la continuarea negocierilor de aderare a
tãrii noastre la UE, în baza calendarului stabilit de Comisia Europeanã.

Departamentul pentru românii de pretutindeni îsi exprimã încrederea cã
initiativa asociatiilor comunitãtilor românesti din emigratie va beneficia de un cât mai larg sprijin, procesul de refacere si consolidare a unitãtii românesti în jurul statului de origine si a intereselor sale fundamentale fiind o realitate si în acelasi timp o necesitate.




SB
................................................................
Moto:
Crede in cel ce cauta Adevarul,
Fereste-te de cel ce l-a gasit.
(A.Gide)
#8823 (raspuns la: #8619) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Would you like to read your name in Paris, London and New York? - de Dinu Lazar la: 22/04/2004 06:22:10
(la: O conversatie cu DINU LAZAR, fotograf)
Dear Friend of Black and White Photography,

Would you like to read your name in Paris, London and New York?

Then take part and win:
your photo along with your name on the new AGFA MULTICONTRAST packages
your photo along with your name all over the world in a high-quality black and white photo calendar
and in addition one of 3 Hasselblad 501 CM cameras
or other prizes


Within the Subject "Move it!" AGFA is looking for the 12 best analogue black and white prints.

All professional photographers, students of photography and enthusiastic amateurs are welcome to join the competition which is still running up to the 28th of May 2004.

Further information as well as the entry form can be found at:
http://www.agfa.com/photo/multicontrast-competition/


Please, tell your colleagues and friends of our competition and forward this message!

We are looking forward to lots of exciting high-quality photos.


With best regards,

Your Agfa Black and White Team

Anja Paufler
CI – Global Marketing Paper


e-mail for further inquiries:
bw-competition@agfa.com
#14305 (raspuns la: #14241) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Stiu ca astea's vechi dar sunt anti-misogin :)) - de Ly la: 27/04/2004 13:30:38
(la: Femeia)
Subject: wife vs husband!

A couple drove down a country road for several miles, not saying a
word. An earlier discussion had led to an argument and neither of
them wanted to concede their position. As they passed a barnyard of mules,
goats, and pigs, the husband asked sarcastically, "Relatives of
yours?"

"Yep," the wife replied, "in-laws."

-----------------

A husband read an article to his wife about how many words women use
a day... 30,000 to a man's 15,000.

The wife replied, "The reason has to be because we have to repeat
everything to men..

The husband then turned to his wife and asked, "What?"

--------------

A man said to his wife one day, "I don't know how you can be so
stupid and so beautiful all at the same time.

" The wife responded, "Allow me to explain. God made me beautiful so
you would be attracted to me; God made me stupid so I would be
attracted to you!

---------------------

A man and his wife were having an argument about who should brew the
coffee each morning.

The wife said, "You should do it, because you get up first, and then
we don't have to wait as long to get our coffee."

The husband said, " You are in charge of cooking around here and you
should do it, because that is your job, and I can just wait for my
coffee."

Wife replies, "No, you should do it, and besides, it is in the Bible
that the man should do the coffee."

Husband replies, "I can't believe that, show me."

So she fetched the Bible, and opened the New Testament and showed him
at the top of several pages, that it indeed says...

"HEBREWS"
This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you.

---------------

Acum ca am restaurant ceva din balanta pe aici..... :)))


Committee to Protect Journalists - de Dinu Lazar la: 06/05/2004 23:51:38
(la: O conversatie cu DINU LAZAR, fotograf)
NEWS
Committee to Protect Journalists

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MAY 3, AT 00:01 GMT (For Monday's Newspapers)

CPJ Names World's Worst Places to Be a Journalist

New York, April 30, 2004-The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) is marking World Press Freedom Day, Monday, May 3, by naming the World's Worst Places to Be a Journalist.
The list of 10 places represents the full range of current threats to press freedom.

At the top of the list is Iraq, where 25 journalists have died since the U.S.-led war began in March 2003. A brutal crackdown launched last year in Cuba by Fidel Castro's government has left an unprecedented 29 journalists behind bars, serving lengthy prison terms of up to 27 years. Last year saw the biggest blow to Zimbabwe's beleaguered press when authorities closed the country's only remaining independent daily. CPJ also placed Turkmenistan, Bangladesh, China, Eritrea, Haiti, the West Bank and Gaza, and Russia on the list of Worst Places to Be a Journalist.


"In all of these places, reporting the news is an act of courage and conviction," said CPJ Executive Director Ann Cooper. "Journalism is essential in helping all of us understand the events that shape our lives, and our need and desire for information cannot be eliminated by violence and repression."


WORLD'S WORST PLACES TO BE A JOURNALIST:

IRAQ

More than a year after the war in Iraq began, the country remains the most dangerous place in the world to work as a journalist. Twenty-five journalists have been killed in action in Iraq since March 2003. Twelve have been killed in 2004 alone-all of them Iraqis.

Postwar Iraq is fraught with risks for reporters: Banditry, gunfire, and bombings are common. Insurgents have added a new threat by systematically targeting foreigners, including journalists, and Iraqis who work for them.
At least six Iraqi media workers have been murdered, and several more have received threats. Armed groups have abducted some eight journalists in 2004, though all have been released.

U.S. forces pose an additional threat to working journalists: at least seven-and possibly as many as nine-journalists have been killed by gunfire from U.S. forces. Other journalists-mostly Arab or Iraqi-have been detained and suffered mistreatment at the hands of U.S. forces.

CUBA

The arrest and long-term imprisonment of 29 journalists in 2003 has decimated Cuba's fledgling independent press. A year after the government of President Fidel Castro Ruz launched a massive crackdown against the press and the political opposition, the imprisoned journalists and their families are harassed and exposed to humiliating prison conditions and psychological torture. They have denounced inadequate medical attention, have been placed in solitary confinement, and have complained about receiving foul-smelling and rotten food. The journalists, who are held in maximum-security facilities, went on hunger strikes several times to demand better conditions. Those journalists who were not imprisoned continue to face routine police intimidation and harassment and are careful about what they write. They say they have been visited by state security officials and issued warnings to stop writing or face the consequences.

ZIMBABWE

For the last four years, Zimbabwe's government has pursued a relentless crackdown on the private press through harassment, censorship, and restrictive legislation. Last year saw the biggest blow to press freedom yet, with authorities closing the Daily News, Zimbabwe's only independent daily and the country's most popular paper. The country's Media and Information Commission (MIC), whose board is government-appointed, refused to register the newspaper despite two court orders to do so. And in February 2004, the Zimbabwean Supreme Court upheld legislation requiring journalists and media outlets to be licensed by the MIC, making it a criminal act to practice journalism without government approval. Those who fail to register face fines and up to two years' imprisonment.

Zimbabwean officials have proven particularly sensitive to coverage of political unrest and the country's severe economic problems. Journalists who reported on pro-democracy rallies were arrested by police and attacked by ruling party supporters. Last year, authorities deported the last foreign reporter based in Zimbabwe, the U.K. Guardian's Andrew Meldrum, whom officials called an "undesirable inhabitant."

TURKMENISTAN

Because political dissent is not tolerated by Turkmenistan's totalitarian regime, independent journalism is practically non-existent.
President-for-life and self-proclaimed "father of all Turkmen,"
Saparmurat
Niyazov, maintains strict control over all newspapers, radio, and television stations by personally appointing editors, and his office approves news reports before they are published or broadcast.

One of the only independent media outlets that penetrates this system of control is the reporting broadcast from abroad by the Turkmen service of the U.S. government-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). And again this year, RFE/RL was subjected to intense official harassment. In September 2003, National Security Service (MNB) agents detained an RFE/RL stringer based in the capital, Ashgabat, for two days, threatened him with 20 years in prison for betraying his country, and injected him multiple times with an unknown substance. More recently, in February 2004, MNB agents arrested two RFE/RL freelancers after one smuggled 800 copies of his banned novel into Turkmenistan. Both were released from prison in March after CPJ and other press freedom groups protested. However, the journalists still face charges of slander and instigating social, ethnic, and religious hatred and have been pressured to sever all ties with RFE/RL.


BANGLADESH

Crime, corruption, and lawlessness make Bangladesh the most violent country for journalists in Asia. Reporters routinely face threats, harassment, and often brutally violent physical attacks in retaliation for their reporting.
Despite promises from government officials to apprehend those responsible for assaults, the majority of attacks on journalists go unpunished. Deep political divisions in the country and within the journalism community also contribute to the climate of fear.

CPJ has documented dozens of violent attacks against Bangladeshi journalists during the last decade, including the murders of seven journalists in the last eight years. Journalists working outside the capital, Dhaka, are particularly vulnerable. Veteran journalist Manik Saha was killed in January
2004 in the southwestern city of Khulna when unidentified assailants threw a homemade bomb at him. In December 2003, a group of thugs affiliated with the ruling Bangladesh Nationalist Party tried to kill Shafiul Haque Mithu in the southwestern town of Pirojpur after he wrote a series of articles exposing local officials' abuse of power.

CHINA

During the last year, the newly installed government of President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao has escalated an assault on the burgeoning independent-minded media in China. Authorities have arrested high-profile editors, closed publications, and imposed news blackouts on politically sensitive events.

The crackdown reached an apex in early 2004, when officials arrested three popular and respected editors from the pioneering Southern Metropolis News for alleged corruption. The charges came after the paper published a series of reports on the resurgence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, local police violence, and other sensitive topics. Chinese journalists have called the arrests the "darkest moment" in 20 years of media reform in China.

Forty-one journalists are now imprisoned in China, making it the world's leading jailer of journalists for the fifth year in a row. Independent writers and commentators on the Internet are particularly targeted for prosecution. The arrest of prominent and outspoken commentator Du Daobin in late 2003 sent a clear message to all Internet writers that free expression online will not be tolerated.

ERITREA

Eritrea has been Africa's foremost jailer of journalists since September 2001, when the government banned the entire private press and detained independent reporters. Seventeen journalists are now in secret jails across the tiny Red Sea nation, almost all of them held incommunicado. President Isaias Afewerki and top government officials have accused independent journalists of espionage, spreading disinformation, and "endangering national unity." Authorities continue to insist that the private press also operated without proper licenses, and that independent journalists routinely evaded the compulsory National Service Program. Despite these allegations, no formal charges have been brought against any of the journalists, and the government has given no indication that it intends to prosecute them.

The ruling party has a firm grip on the state media, whose employees are censored and also practice self-censorship. Afewerki has been unfazed by persistent international denunciation of his human rights record and continues to dismiss foreign critics as enemies of Eritrea.


HAITI

Press freedom conditions have seriously deteriorated in Haiti since September 2003, when the murder of a notorious gang leader sparked nationwide violence. From January to March 2004, journalists became targets during the uprising that led to the ouster of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide on February 29. While hostility against Haitian journalists is common, foreign correspondents were also attacked while covering the two-month rebellion. In March, a Spanish television correspondent was killed and a U.S. photographer was wounded by gunfire. Several radio stations were torched around the country. Investigations into the 2000 and 2001 murders of two prominent Haitian journalists have shown no progress. The Haitian judicial system's failure to prosecute these crimes has perpetuated a climate of impunity, forcing dozens of journalists to go into exile or seek political asylum.

THE WEST BANK AND GAZA

The West Bank and Gaza Strip remains one of the most unpredictable and potentially dangerous assignments for journalists. At least three journalists have been killed there since April 2003-each by Israeli army gunfire. Israeli troops often harass or attack Palestinian journalists, and Israeli authorities enforce tough restrictions on their freedom of movement.
Palestinian journalists are vulnerable to the increasing lawlessness in the Occupied Territories.

Palestinian militias and armed groups have frequently threatened and assaulted reporters and in some cases have ransacked news offices. In 2003 and 2004, Palestinian gunmen raided two television news offices and a newspaper in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, attacked a correspondent on the street in Gaza, and assaulted a reporter in Ramallah.

RUSSIA

President Vladimir Putin's "managed democracy," which includes using various branches of the state bureaucracy to rein in the independent media, is making the practice of independent journalism in Russia more and more tenuous. A shift from blatant pressures to more subtle and covert tactics, such as politicized lawsuits and hostile corporate takeovers by businessmen with close ties to Putin, has allowed the Kremlin to stifle criticism of the president and reports on government corruption and human rights abuses committed by Russian forces in Chechnya.

In advance of the December 2003 parliamentary elections and March 2004 presidential elections, the Kremlin tightened its legal and bureaucratic controls over the domestic press. Russian press groups criticized the Central Election Commission for failing to sanction the state-run national television channels for improperly promoting Putin and pro-Kremlin parties during the campaigns.

Journalists in Russia's provinces continue to be murdered with impunity.
In
October 2003, the editor-in-chief of an independent newspaper in the Volga River city of Togliatti was stabbed to death because of his paper's coverage of organized crime and government corruption. He was the paper's second editor-in-chief to be murdered in 18 months.

The Committee to Protect Journalists is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending press freedom worldwide.




"The only death you die is the one you die daily by not living. Dream big and dare to fail." - Norman Vaughn

Sallie Dean Shatz
sallie@sopris.net
970 923 6757 h
970 948 2901 cell
#15072 (raspuns la: #15037) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Magdalema - de Little Eagle la: 30/06/2004 03:16:15
(la: Ozzy vs LMC)
Dear.Sis,
Imi.pare.simker.rau.ka.mu.am.putut.sa-ti.skriu.....am.progleme.ke.komputerul
si.treguie.reparat...am..skris...2...tekste.tsie.si.le-am.pierdut.......Am.mesoie.de.um.mou.keygoard!
Platesk.pt.ka.te-am.atakat.ku.kusimte.rele......karma....deh....de.simeri.mu.mai.fumktsiomeasa.ka.lumea!!!!!Sper.sa.imtelegi.skrisul...

Am.sa-ti,skriu.kuramd,te.iumesk.la.memumie,I.might.ge.a.gad.goy.still....like...a...14.year.khild...a...proglem...khild,how.Marilym,kalls.me....gut.I.Iam.simkere
Amd,If.I.tell.you.that.I.Lowe.you,I,will.die,for,you.amd.I.dom't'egem.kmow.who
you.really.are!

Here.is.my.phome#,Kall.me.or.let.me.kall.you,kum.doresti.As.dori.sa.gorjesk.ku.time,sa-ti.aud.gokhea.
Home:1-732-290-2496
Kell:1-908-902-4488
Faks:1-732-290-2542

Kall.me.aytime!!!Iwork.from.home.As.putea,fi.plekat.itkhi,shi,kolo.leage,a,message.with.your.phome.#,Am.sa.te.sum,as.dori.mult.sa.oresk.ku.time.

Ku.mult.drag,
Ossy

Ps.Kime.grea.sa.gorgeaska.ku.mime,da-mi.telefom.
Asta.sumt,...the.good.amd.the.gad.im.ome.persom...HA,HA!Gut,I.lowe,you,all
Mu
pot
fi.departedefoi...si...gred.ka.mitkhi,foi.de.mime.....

Magdalema,I.LOWE>YOU>!!!!Mu.sumt.rau.si,mu.krede.ka-s.pormit.im.gamduri.seksuale.spre.time....kiteodsata,sumt.kretim.asta.sumt\aproglem.khild....
Kred.ka.im.kafemea.aseti.mesoie.si.de.krasy.like.me....HA!HA!


Lowe,
Ossy




















#17026 (raspuns la: #16959) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Pt. RSI si Paianjenul - de Muresh la: 05/09/2004 20:05:58
(la: Nasterea din fecioara, demonstrata stiintific ca posibila)
Am cautat , in paralel cu tine , RSI, un link . Am gasit trei link-uri interesante . Primul este (the) "DECLARATION ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CHURCH TO NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS " intr-un link paralel cu al tau , RSI :

http://www.bc.edu/research/cjl/meta-elements/texts/documents/catholic/Nostra_Aetate.htm

Aceasta Declaratie a fost adoptata dupa decesul papei Ioan XXIII in 1963 .

Extrag din aceasta declaratie :

" Even though the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ (see Jn 19:6), neither all Jews indiscriminately at that time, nor Jews today, can be charged with the crimes committed during his passion. It is true that the church is the new people of God, yet the Jews should not be spoken of as rejected or accursed as if this followed from holy scripture. Consequently, all must take care, lest in catechizing or in preaching the word of God, they teach anything which is not in accord with the truth of the Gospel message or the spirit of Christ. "

Al doilea link se refera la scurta istorie a adoptarii acestei Declaratii si a intentiei initiale a papei Ioan XXIII care a vrut ca in Declaratie sa apara in mod EXPLICIT anularea invinovatirii de deicid "

http://historicaltextarchive.com/sections.php?op=viewarticle&artid=76

Extrag din acest al doilea link :

"after John announced the commencement of the Second Vatican Council, he ordered the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity to draw up a document that would speak out against anti-semitism and the notion of Jews as "deicides." He had planned for the so-called "Schema on Ecumenism" to be introduced and ratified during the opening session. He did not anticipate the resistance and popular debate that would eventually lead to the construction of a new document called "The Declaration on the Relationship of the Church to Non-Christian Religions," passed in 31 a later session of the Council, after John's death in 1963……The phrase "the Jews should not be presented as repudiated or cursed by God," which appeared in the final draft, originally included:
"OR GUILTY OF DEICID"
in earlier drafts of the Declaration. This phrase was EXCISED before the final draft, a move blasted by Blanshard and other critics as anti-semitic. A less emotional response and more careful inquiry would show that to include (and therefore theologically legitimize) "deicide" in an official Church proclamation would cause untold theological problems;

the Church could not proclaim that God was dead or could even be killed.

Aceasta ultima fraza spune totul : Biserica nu poate sa accepte intr-un document oficial ca Dumnezeu (fiul , ma rog , n.n) ar putea fi ucis .

Al treilea link citeaza din Declaratie si ataca problema dintr-un alt unghi , si eu am scris asta intr-o postare anterioara :

"Nostra Aetate states this central Gospel truth quite clearly: "Christ in his boundless love freely underwent his passion and death because of the sins of all, so that all might attain salvation. Therefore, any presentations that explicitly or implicitly seek to shift responsibility from human sin onto this or that historical group, such as the Jews, can only be said to obscure a core gospel truth. "

http://www.the-tidings.com/2004/0220/nostra.htm

Adica Iisus , prin moartea sa a "sters" pana si pacatele evreilor care ,
dupa cele scrise in VT , l-ar fi predat romanilor .

Numai bine ,

Muresh


#21121 (raspuns la: #21101) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Domnul webmaster....please ! - de (anonim) la: 29/09/2004 19:42:35
(la: Reorganizare)
Cauta si publica un message de la http://tinyurl.com/5sosn deschis de Cecilia.
Am adaugat 2 site-uri folositoare acolo pentru familia cafenelei.

salutari,
sixpack
#23728 (raspuns la: #23706) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Articol din "Atlanta Journal" - de (anonim) la: 05/11/2004 02:26:40
(la: Alegerile in USA)
Comentariu de Zell Miller, senator democrat din Georgia. Imi cer scuze, dar mi-e prea lene sa traduc. Enjoy.

I tried to tell you . . .
Democrats repel voters, who put faith in freedom

Published on: 11/04/04
America's faith in freedom has been reaffirmed. With the re-election of President Bush, America recommitted itself once again to expanding freedom and promoting liberty. Only the 1864 re-election of Abraham Lincoln, the 1944 re-election of Franklin Roosevelt and the 1980 election of Ronald Reagan rival this victory as milestones in the preservation of our security by the advancement of freedom.


This election validated not just freedom, but also the faith our Founding Fathers placed in average folks to navigate the course of this great nation. By weighing the greatest issues at the gravest times and choosing our path, ordinary people have again accomplished extraordinary things. With courage and caution, rather than fear and timidity, the voters chose a path to ensure others would enjoy the same freedom to set their own path.

This election outcome should have been implausible, if not impossible. With a litany of complaints — bad economy, bad deficit, bad foreign war, bad gas prices — amplified by a national media that discarded any pretense of neutrality, a national opposition party should have won this election.

But the Democratic Party is no longer a national party. As difficult as the challenges are — both real and fabricated — Democrats offered no solution that was either believable or acceptable to vast regions of America. Tax increases to grow the economy are not a solution that is believable or acceptable. Democratic promises of fiscal responsibility are unbelievable in the face of massive new spending promises. A foreign policy based on the strength of "allies" such as France is unacceptable. A strong national defense policy is just not believable coming from a candidate who built a career as an anti-war veteran, an anti-military candidate and an anti-action senator.

Democratic Party policies haven't sold in large sections of America in decades, and the only success of Democrats in presidential elections for 40 years was when they pitched themselves as pro-growth, low-tax, strong-defense, fiscally responsible, values-oriented candidates. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton hummed the tune but never really sang the song, and that's why Democrat prospects have gone south in the South. In 1980, the South had 20 Democrats and just six Republicans in the Senate. As recently as 1994, the Senate had 17 Democrats and nine Republicans from the South.

A decade later, the number had reversed to 17 Republicans and nine Democrats. With this election, it is 22 Republicans and just four Democrats from the South. When will national Democrats sober up and admit that that dog won't hunt? Secular socialism, heavy taxes, big spending, weak defense, limitless lawsuits and heavy regulation — that pack of beagles hasn't caught a rabbit in the South or Midwest in years. The most recent failed nominee for president stands as proof that the national Democratic Party will continue to dwindle. The South has gone from just one-fourth of the Electoral College in 1960 to almost a third today. To put this in perspective, that gain is equal to all the electoral votes in Ohio. Yet there was not a single Southern state where John Kerry had any real chance. Would anyone like to place bets on the electoral strength of the South by 2012? Maybe they should tax stupidity. When you write off centrist and conservative policies that reflect the will of people in the South and Midwest, you write off the South and Midwest. Democrats have never learned from the second or third or fifth kick of a mule. They continue to change only the makeup on, rather than makeup of, the Democrat Party.

And so we have a realignment election. For the first time, in an "us vs. them" election and in the toughest of situations, Republicans have been re-elected to the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. Confronting an opposition that can win a divided electorate in the worst of times and that has a growing electoral base, the national Democratic Party has a choice: continue down this path toward irrelevance or reverse course. As the last Truman Democrat, I hope my party makes the right choice but know I will not be allowed to be part of it. Such is the price you pay when you love your nation more than your party.

And so while I retire with little hope for the near-term viability of the party I've spent my life building, I retire with a quiet satisfaction that after witnessing the struggle of democracy over communism and fascism, the fear I once held that America might not rise to meet this new challenge of terrorism has vanished like a fog under the radiance of a new dawn. While the threat is still real, the shadow looming across a promising future is gone.

And the credit for that goes to one man. Like the last lion of England, Winston Churchill, George W. Bush has stood alone and risked all to give the world a new, clearer path to the advancement of freedom.

Abraham Lincoln, in his second annual message to Congress, stated: "In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom for the free — honorable alike in what we give and what we preserve. We shall nobly save or meanly lose the last, best hope of earth."

George Bush has injected into a region of enslavement an incurable dose of freedom, and thus nobly saved that "last, best hope of earth" — free men.

— Zell Miller is Georgia's Democratic U.S. senator.
Articol din Atlanta Constitution - de Horia D la: 05/11/2004 02:30:24
(la: Alegerile in USA)
Acest articol a aparut azi. Autorul este senator democrat de Georgia.
Imi cer scuze, am avut o zi lunga, si imi este foarte lene ca sa traduc. Enjoy, and think about it!


I tried to tell you . . .
Democrats repel voters, who put faith in freedom

Published on: 11/04/04
America's faith in freedom has been reaffirmed. With the re-election of President Bush, America recommitted itself once again to expanding freedom and promoting liberty. Only the 1864 re-election of Abraham Lincoln, the 1944 re-election of Franklin Roosevelt and the 1980 election of Ronald Reagan rival this victory as milestones in the preservation of our security by the advancement of freedom.


This election validated not just freedom, but also the faith our Founding Fathers placed in average folks to navigate the course of this great nation. By weighing the greatest issues at the gravest times and choosing our path, ordinary people have again accomplished extraordinary things. With courage and caution, rather than fear and timidity, the voters chose a path to ensure others would enjoy the same freedom to set their own path.

This election outcome should have been implausible, if not impossible. With a litany of complaints — bad economy, bad deficit, bad foreign war, bad gas prices — amplified by a national media that discarded any pretense of neutrality, a national opposition party should have won this election.

But the Democratic Party is no longer a national party. As difficult as the challenges are — both real and fabricated — Democrats offered no solution that was either believable or acceptable to vast regions of America. Tax increases to grow the economy are not a solution that is believable or acceptable. Democratic promises of fiscal responsibility are unbelievable in the face of massive new spending promises. A foreign policy based on the strength of "allies" such as France is unacceptable. A strong national defense policy is just not believable coming from a candidate who built a career as an anti-war veteran, an anti-military candidate and an anti-action senator.

Democratic Party policies haven't sold in large sections of America in decades, and the only success of Democrats in presidential elections for 40 years was when they pitched themselves as pro-growth, low-tax, strong-defense, fiscally responsible, values-oriented candidates. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton hummed the tune but never really sang the song, and that's why Democrat prospects have gone south in the South. In 1980, the South had 20 Democrats and just six Republicans in the Senate. As recently as 1994, the Senate had 17 Democrats and nine Republicans from the South.

A decade later, the number had reversed to 17 Republicans and nine Democrats. With this election, it is 22 Republicans and just four Democrats from the South. When will national Democrats sober up and admit that that dog won't hunt? Secular socialism, heavy taxes, big spending, weak defense, limitless lawsuits and heavy regulation — that pack of beagles hasn't caught a rabbit in the South or Midwest in years. The most recent failed nominee for president stands as proof that the national Democratic Party will continue to dwindle. The South has gone from just one-fourth of the Electoral College in 1960 to almost a third today. To put this in perspective, that gain is equal to all the electoral votes in Ohio. Yet there was not a single Southern state where John Kerry had any real chance. Would anyone like to place bets on the electoral strength of the South by 2012? Maybe they should tax stupidity. When you write off centrist and conservative policies that reflect the will of people in the South and Midwest, you write off the South and Midwest. Democrats have never learned from the second or third or fifth kick of a mule. They continue to change only the makeup on, rather than makeup of, the Democrat Party.

And so we have a realignment election. For the first time, in an "us vs. them" election and in the toughest of situations, Republicans have been re-elected to the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. Confronting an opposition that can win a divided electorate in the worst of times and that has a growing electoral base, the national Democratic Party has a choice: continue down this path toward irrelevance or reverse course. As the last Truman Democrat, I hope my party makes the right choice but know I will not be allowed to be part of it. Such is the price you pay when you love your nation more than your party.

And so while I retire with little hope for the near-term viability of the party I've spent my life building, I retire with a quiet satisfaction that after witnessing the struggle of democracy over communism and fascism, the fear I once held that America might not rise to meet this new challenge of terrorism has vanished like a fog under the radiance of a new dawn. While the threat is still real, the shadow looming across a promising future is gone.

And the credit for that goes to one man. Like the last lion of England, Winston Churchill, George W. Bush has stood alone and risked all to give the world a new, clearer path to the advancement of freedom.

Abraham Lincoln, in his second annual message to Congress, stated: "In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom for the free — honorable alike in what we give and what we preserve. We shall nobly save or meanly lose the last, best hope of earth."

George Bush has injected into a region of enslavement an incurable dose of freedom, and thus nobly saved that "last, best hope of earth" — free men.

— Zell Miller is Georgia's Democratic U.S. senator.

The things that come to those who wait are what's left behind by those
who got there first.
Instructions for a wife then and now - de MMM la: 16/11/2004 04:16:47
(la: Femeia)
The following is from a 1950's Home Economics textbook intended for
the High School girls, teaching how to prepare for married life.

1. Have dinner ready: Plan ahead, even the night before, to have a
delicious meal - on time. This is a way of letting him know that you
have been thinking about him, and are concerned about his needs. Most
men are hungry when they come home and the prospects of a good meal
are part of the warm welcome needed.

2. Prepare yourself: Take 15 minutes to rest so you will be refreshed
when he arrives. Touch up your make-up, put a ribbon in your hair and
be fresh looking. He has just been with a lot of work-weary people. Be
a little gay and a little more interesting. His boring day may need a
lift.

3. Clear away the clutter. Make one last trip through the main part of
the house just before your husband arrives, gathering up school books,
toys, paper, etc. Then run a dust cloth over the tables. Your husband
will feel he has reached a haven of rest and order, and it will give
you a lift too.

4. Prepare the children: Take a few minutes to wash the children's
hands and faces if they are small, comb their hair, and if necessary,
change their clothes. They are little treasures and he would like to
see them playing the part.

5. Minimize the noise: At the time of his arrival, eliminate all noise
of washer, dryer, dishwasher, or vacuum. Try to encourage the children
to be quiet. Be happy to see him. Greet him with a warm smile and be
glad to see him.

6. Some DON'TS: Don't greet him with problems or complaints. Don't
complain if he's late for dinner. Count this as minor compared with
what he might have gone through that day.

7. Make him comfortable: Have him lean back in a comfortable chair or
suggest he lie down in the bedroom. Have a cool or warm drink ready
for him. Arrange his pillow and offer to take off his shoes. Speak in
a low, soft, soothing and pleasant voice. Allow him to relax and
unwind.

8. Listen to him: You may have a dozen things to tell him, but the
moment of his arrival is not the time. Let him talk first.

9. Make the evening his: Never complain if he does not take you out to
dinner or to other places of entertainment; instead try to understand
his world of strain and pressure and his need to be home and relax.

10. The Goal: Try to make your home a place of peace and order where
your husband can relax.


Now The updated version for the 2000s woman.

1. Have dinner ready: Make reservations ahead of time. If your day
becomes too hectic just leave him a voice mail message regarding where
you'd like to eat and at what time. This lets him know that your day
has been crappy and gives him an opportunity to change your mood.

2. Prepare yourself: A quick stop at the "LANCOME" counter on your way
home will do wonders for your outlook and will keep you from becoming
irritated every time he belches at the table. (Don't forget to use his
credit card!)

3. Clear away the clutter: Call the housekeeper and let her know
you'll need her for an extra day this week. Tell her that any
miscellaneous items left on the floor by the children can be placed in
the Goodwill box in the garage.

4. Prepare the children: Drop them off at grandma's!

5. Minimize the noise: When he arrives at home remind him that the
washer and garbage disposal are still not working properly and the
noise is driving you crazy (but do this in a nice way and greet him
with a warm smile...this way he might fix it faster).

6. Some DON'TS: Don't greet him with problems and complaints. Let him
speak first, and then your complaints will get more attention and
remain fresh in his mind throughout dinner. Don't complain if he's
late for dinner. Simply remind him that the last one home does the
cooking and the cleanup.

7. Make him comfortable: Remind him where he can find a warm fuzzy
blanket if he's cold. This will show you really care.

8. Listen to him: But don't ever let him get the last word.

9. Make the evening his: a chance to get the washer and garbage
disposal fixed.

10. The Goal: To try to keep things amicable without reminding him
that you make more money than he does.



MMM
20D... si altele :) - de renatoa la: 28/11/2004 13:57:38
(la: O conversatie cu DINU LAZAR, fotograf)
Cred ca cel de pe Imaging Resources este mai bogat informativ, are teste mai riguroase, iar testele imatest sunt de-a dreptul coplesitoare...

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E20D/E20DA.HTM

Apropo de test facut in Romania: cine, de ce, cui prodest?
Cine: aparatul nu prea sta pe rafturi la noi, daca intrebi la putinele site-uri care il au afisat pe net iti raspund ca se aduce la comanda. A incercat cineva, vreo revista din care ziceati saptamina trecuta :D sa sune la Canon Romania sa le ceara un sample ca sa ii faca un articol? Cam asa cum face Mr.Reichmann :)
De ce: deja exista destula informatie pentru ca un vorbitor de limba engleza sa poata compila suficienta informatie ca sa isi justifice cumparearea sau nu a unui aparat, oarecare, nu numai acesta.
Cui ar folosi: ei... aici e aici... cred ca nu scriam toate astea, daca nu as fi avut ieri un chat interesant cu un colistas de pe ftm. Am discutat de 300D si D70, de care s-a scris mult mai mult decit de 20D. Si totusi, multe nu se stiau... partial limba engleza, partial insuficienta informare... Deci se pare ca astfel de materiale, in limba romana, si care sa concentreze esenta a ceeace este pe net in citeva locuri, ar ajuta pe unii la o decizie de cumparare. Caci magazinelor si firmelor producatoare se pare ca li se... "lasa, ca citesc ei in Chasseurs d'images si e de ajuns"...
O problema ar fi: e nevoie ca aceste materiale sa fie neaparat originale, sa exprime parerea autorului, chiar daca totul s-a scris? Sau ar fi mai utila o traducere si o compilare (inteligenta)?
Alta problema ar fi: cita credibilitate ar avea... daca eu zic undeva ca Phil Askey nu are dreptate, ma ia cineva in seama? caici daca nu vor fi bagate in seama, inseamna ca s-a muncit degeaba...
Mai sunt multe: echilibristica pe care ar trebui sa o faca autorul printre fanii diverselor tabere, rezistenta la "mijloace de convingere" cind aceste scripturi ar avea succes si o firma va incerca sa il faca sa scrie de bine, etc... dar astea cred ca intra tot la credibilitate.

Si in fine, apropo de "si altele", astazi a aparut pe dpreview un puncte de vedere pe care il consider cea mai echilibrata si realistica comparatie 20D - D70 citita pina acum. A se citi: corespunde cel mai mult cu experienta personala si parerea mea de pina acum despre ambele camere.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=11230197
#30059 (raspuns la: #29985) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Pt. DESTIN - de ueit la: 30/11/2004 12:54:12
(la: Destin)
"In ceea ce priveste: "se poate demonstra" poti sa aduci argumente?"

In cadrul articolului de care vorbeam,

http://atschool.eduweb.co.uk/rmext04/92andwed/pf_quant.html#Q25

se demonstreaza matematic acest fapt. Concluzia este:

"The bottom line is that you can't use tachyons to send information faster than the speed of light from one place to another. Doing so would require creating a message encoded some way in a localized tachyon field, and sending it off at superluminal speed toward the intended receiver. But as we have seen you can't have it both ways - localized tachyon disturbances are subluminal and superluminal disturbances are nonlocal."

Ciatatul pe care il aduci imi confirma pozitia:

"These assertions fly in the face of both theory and experiment, as they violate both Einstein's special theory of relativity and causality and lack any experimental support."

Avand in vedere deci ca tahionii nu au fost detectati experimental si, mai mult, nu pot transporta informatii, nu cred ca pot fi un argument pentru existenta profetiilor sau destinului. In orice caz, daca ai cunostinta despre un articol care sa-ti sustina ipoteza sunt curios sa-l citesc.

Si veti cunoaste adevarul, iar adevarul va va face liberi.
(Ioan 8:32)
#30195 (raspuns la: #30089) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
emily - de (anonim) la: 03/12/2004 23:17:35
(la: Cele mai frumoase poezii)
Si mie imi place (da, inca...) emily dickinson, dar nu scriu pentru asta...iti raspuns ca unei persoane fidele si pasionate de poezia ei...
daca gasesti o culegere care se cheama "singuratate si poezie"(ed. bilingva, 1995) vei vedea ca au si titluri. Nici eu nu am stiut multa vreme de ce dickinson era asa de indepartata vietii celei agitate si de ce poeziile ei sint atit de cumplit de triste. De ce scria ea "this is my message to the world" ma mai intrebam...Pentru ca faptul ca era oarba ii dadea dreptul sa scrie asa cum a scris. Poate ca daca era altcineva suna ridicol.
De-aia statea e.d acasa.

Mie mi se pare ca poeziile Magdei Isanos se apropie intrucitva de ale ei.

Noapte buna!
#30627 (raspuns la: #29188) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
doamnelor :) - de Belle la: 07/03/2005 20:24:49
(la: Trancaneala Aristocrata "2")
jimmy ....
zice: The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

jimmy-cecilia@yemen.net.ye on 3/7/2005 1:34 PM
The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address.


anisia... sa-mi spui daca ai nevoie de-ajutor cu datul afara pe fereastra
si revin la remarca initiala: cat tupeu!!! auzi la ea, inca doua zile libere tz tz tz
#38512 (raspuns la: #38508) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
Jimmy - de anisia la: 07/03/2005 20:29:57
(la: Trancaneala Aristocrata "2")
mi-a venit inapoi urmatorul mesaj:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

:
65.162.184.50 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 Unknown user
Giving up on 65.162.184.50.

ceea ce inseamna ca nu a mers smechereala...
#38514 (raspuns la: #38512) comenteaza . modifica . semnaleaza adminului
calypso - de donquijote la: 25/05/2005 20:38:56
(la: Unde a disparut condica de prezenta???)
dureaza cam 6-8 saptamani. confirmarea e subiectiva fiind facuta de persoanele cu drept de admin si bazata pe impresia facuta din continutul postarilor. cu cat postezi mai mult, dar si calitativ sansele sunt mai mari sa fi confirmata mai repede.
pm (private message) si postare imediata vin odata cu confirmarea.
rabdare...



Cursuri de matematica si fizica online!
Incearca-le gratuit acum

Peste 3500 de videouri de cursuri cu teorie, teste si exemple explicate
www.prepa.ro
loading...